This chapter explains multiple routing protocols (particularly dynamic routing protocols) and describes their relative strengths and weaknesses. It also shows how to read a routing table easily and interpret the IPv6 routing information listed within it.
There are two main distance vector routing protocols. This section highlights similarities and differences between RIP and EIGRP.
The Routing Information Protocol (RIP) was a first generation routing protocol for IPv4 originally specified in RFC 1058. It is easy to configure, making it a good choice for small networks.
RIPv1 has the following key characteristics:
In 1993, RIPv1 evolved to a classless routing protocol known as RIP version 2 (RIPv2). RIPv2 introduced the following improvements:
Table 3-5 summarizes the differences between RIPv1 and RIPv2.
Characteristics and Features
RIPv1
RIPv2
Metric
Both use hop count as a simple metric. The maximum number of hops is 15.
Updates Forwarded to Address
Supports VLSM
Supports CIDR
Supports Summarization
Supports Authentication
RIP updates are encapsulated into a UDP segment, with both source and destination port numbers set to UDP port 520.
In 1997, the IPv6-enabled version of RIP was released. RIPng is based on RIPv2. It still has a 15-hop limitation and the administrative distance is 120.
The Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) was the first proprietary IPv4 routing protocol, developed by Cisco in 1984. It used the following design characteristics:
In 1992, IGRP was replaced by Enhanced IGRP (EIGRP). Like RIPv2, EIGRP also introduced support for VLSM and CIDR. EIGRP increases efficiency, reduces routing updates, and supports secure message exchange.
Table 3-6 summarizes the differences between IGRP and EIGRP.
Characteristics and Features
IGRP
EIGRP
Metric
Both use a composite metric based on bandwidth and delay. Reliability and load can also be included in the metric calculation if configured.
Updates Forwarded to Address
Supports VLSM
Supports CIDR
Supports Summarization
Supports Authentication
EIGRP also introduced:
Activity 3.2.2.3: Compare RIP and EIGRP
Go to the online course to perform this practice activity.
Packet Tracer Activity 3.2.2.4: Comparing RIP and EIGRP Path Selection
PCA and PCB need to communicate. The path that the data takes between these end devices can travel through R1, R2, and R3, or it can travel through R4 and R5. The process by which routers select the best path depends on the routing protocol. We will examine the behavior of two distance vector routing protocols, Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) and Routing Information Protocol version 2 (RIPv2).